Source: AMP
Alongside this demand growth for infrastructure assets by investors there has been a corresponding increase in undeployed capital within unlisted infrastructure funds.
According to Preqin, “dry powder” in unlisted core and core-plus infrastructure has consistently grown from its previous highs to the March 2020 record level of US$122 billion since 2012. Dry powder is committed capital that has yet to be deployed.
It is only natural that listed companies with access to high-quality infrastructure assets have become a viable standalone asset class and are increasingly becoming potential targets for unlisted infrastructure funds under pressure to put capital to work.
Just a decade ago, listed infrastructure was a niche asset class and poorly understood by many investors. It is now a diverse US$3 trillion investment opportunity and more than US$60 billion (source: eVestment, December 2019) is being managed by specialist listed infrastructure managers.
Listed infrastructure expands opportunities
By investing through listed infrastructure, investors can access a broad set of liquid investment opportunities across geographies and sectors that may not be available through direct investment.
Regulatory frameworks and contract structures vary greatly from sector to sector and from region to region, as they are based on and exposed to macro variables in different ways.
Furthermore, diversification can help mitigate risk in concentrated exposure to regional economic downturns and regulations.
Although listed and unlisted infrastructure assets with the same economic exposures will behave similarly to changes in the economic environment, valuation leads and lags do arise between both unlisted and listed infrastructure, due to the mark-to-model versus mark-to-market effect.
Unlisted infrastructure assets’ valuation cycles are typically bi-annual with fewer unlisted comparative transactions, resulting in lower volatility. While daily valuations can lead to higher volatility for listed infrastructure, active listed infrastructure managers are able to take advantage of the opportunities it can create.
Despite volatility of valuation, long-term infrastructure investors should appreciate the majority of the volatility is driven by multiple expansion/contraction, but over the long term this has little impact, as cash flow growth is ultimately what delivers returns.
Years with negative total return have primarily been driven by (valuation) multiple compression, but over the long term the multiples effect has been neutral. This is why we believe it is key to focus on cash flows and that short-term volatility can create opportunities.
Figure 2: Listed infrastructure return breakdown